The calls for reparations from African leaders — amplified recently by Ghana's President John Dramani Mahama at the African Union's 2025 Mid-Year Coordination Meeting — are growing louder. President Mahama declared that Africa’s call for “reparative justice” is no longer a whisper, but a “unified demand grounded in historical truth and moral clarity.”
But here’s the hard truth: this “unified demand” is neither historically complete nor morally honest — and without facing difficult questions, this conversation risks becoming nothing more than political theater.
So, let’s ask those questions. The ones many avoid. The ones that actually matter if we’re serious about justice.
This podcast challenges the prevailing narrative surrounding African reparations by revealing the complicity of African leaders in the slave trade and colonial era. It sheds light on ongoing corruption and prompts critical questions.
Africa is not a single story.
North African Berbers and Arabs were dealing in white slaves from Europe and Eastern Europe for centuries.
East Africa had its own long-standing Arab slave trade, stretching deep into the Indian Ocean world.
West Africa, particularly along the Gulf of Guinea, was deeply involved in the Transatlantic slave trade.
So when African leaders say “Africa demands reparations,” from whom? And for whom? Are we erasing the distinctions between region, role, and responsibility?
The idea that Africa was one united victim of Western exploitation doesn't reflect the historical record. And it raises a tough question: can a continent that was itself deeply divided and often complicit in slavery speak with one moral voice on this issue?
Let’s say it plainly: many African tribes, kings, and elites actively participated in the Transatlantic slave trade.
They captured and sold rival groups — often brutally — in exchange for European goods, weapons, and political leverage. The Ashanti Empire, the Dahomey Kingdom, and others built real wealth and influence from this trade.
If we’re demanding reparations from Europeans for their role in slavery, then:
Do we also demand accountability from African descendants of the collaborators?
Will African nations acknowledge and confront their own history of internal exploitation?
Historical justice must include all truths, not just those that are politically convenient.
Let’s be blunt.
Africa's greatest theft today isn’t from the 18th century — it’s from corrupt leaders in the 21st.
Across the continent:
Infrastructure projects are started and never finished.
Politicians buy land with insider knowledge and flip it for profit.
Foreign aid and state budgets are looted and laundered.
Ghana, Nigeria, South Africa — pick your example. The trend is depressingly consistent. The people of Africa are being robbed by their own, and reparations rhetoric gives some leaders moral cover to distract from their own failures.
So we ask:
Why should foreign nations pay reparations to governments that can’t manage what they already have?
Where would the money go? Who would benefit? Who would actually be healed?
If there’s no accountability, then reparations become just another pipeline for elite enrichment.
Why is the reparations narrative focused almost exclusively on the West?
The Arab slave trade:
Preceded the European slave trade by centuries.
Enslaved millions of East and Central Africans.
Included brutal practices like castration, concubinage, and forced conversions.
Yet there are no high-level AU speeches calling on Saudi Arabia, Egypt, or the Gulf States to pay reparations. Why?
Because this is not just about justice — it’s about leverage. Western governments are wealthy, guilt-laden, and politically susceptible to pressure. Middle Eastern nations? Not so much.
This glaring omission reveals the selective morality at the heart of many reparations arguments. If you truly care about justice, you don’t cherry-pick your villains.
This is perhaps the hardest pill to swallow.
The African elites who participated in the slave trade didn’t disappear — their descendants and institutional legacies often hold power today.
They:
Control land and political offices.
Dominate industries.
Continue the age-old cycle of profiting from the suffering of the masses.
So who, exactly, is the victim in this reparations story? Is it the average Ghanaian or Nigerian citizen struggling to find clean water, a job, or education? Or is it the political class using “colonial injustice” as a distraction while they continue to plunder?
We must be honest: in many cases, the oppressor is no longer foreign.
There’s no question that slavery, colonialism, and racism inflicted catastrophic damage on African societies. That historical reality cannot be denied.
But there’s a difference between acknowledging history and weaponizing it for modern political gain.
Many of these reparations campaigns are being driven by:
Politicians trying to gain moral authority they haven’t earned.
Governments looking for foreign cash without internal reform.
Narratives that erase African agency, complexity, and complicity.
Justice cannot be built on half-truths, selective memory, or moral grandstanding.
If we are serious — truly serious — about justice, then reparations must include:
Transparent, accountable mechanisms — not blank checks to corrupt regimes.
Internal reckoning with African involvement in slavery and exploitation.
Broader targets, including Arab states, African elites, and global corporations.
Conditional support tied to governance reform, education, and long-term development — not political theater.
At CapeCoastCastle.com, we believe the hardest questions are the most necessary ones.
The legacy of slavery and colonialism deserves deep, honest engagement — not slogans, not selective outrage, and not political opportunism.
Let’s demand truth, transparency, and accountability — from all parties. Not just the West. Not just the past.
Because without it, reparations become just another tool for the powerful, and another disappointment for the people.
Let’s talk about the real issues. No filters. No theatre. Just truth.
Read More:
For those interested in how memory and fiction intersect, explore other reflections on this site.